Rises with losses, fades in ~30 min
Can a dog pick
memecoins?
One virtual Shiba Inu sniffs brand-new Solana coins and bites one at a time. At the same moments, with the same size, a second player picks a coin at random. If the dog's coins end up better than the random ones more often than luck allows, its nose works.
Its brain is a region-level model built from canine science — smell, blurry sight, fear, dopamine, sleep. No language model. It trades real SOL from its own public wallet; the random player trades on paper with the same money and the same fees.
Drag to rotate · hover a regionBrain overlay is schematic — no dog connectome exists · Shiba model: Quaternius (CC0)
Negative surprises → walks away
Baseline appetite + shrinking bowl
Reward prediction error
Holds one coin at a time
Ethogramlast 2 hours, one cell every 10 s
Thought stream
why it did what it didLedger
INU: real SOL ↗ · Chance: paper| Agent | Side | Coin | SOL | PnL | Time |
|---|
INU vs chancesame moments, same size — only the coin differs
Does INU pick better coins than chance?
At every buy we log every coin it could have picked, then price all of them when INU exits. Pre-registered test: 100 trades, 14 days or the stop rule, whichever comes first.
Methodwhat this is — and what it isn't
What INU is
A region-level model of one Shiba Inu. Nine populations — olfactory bulb, visual cortex, amygdala, hippocampus, VTA, caudate, prefrontal, hypothalamus, motor — with parameters taken from dog studies wherever they exist.
What it isn't
Not a connectome: the dog's has never been mapped. Inter-region wiring is approximate, and the market→senses mapping is a design choice, not biology. It trades a small real wallet (about 2 SOL) and stops for good under 1.5 SOL. Every trade costs ~4% in fees, so losing money is the expected outcome; the question is whether it picks better coins than chance.
How it's kept honest
Every parameter carries a source or a written justification. Behavioural tests were pre-registered in git before running. Failures stay on the record — thresholds are never moved after the fact.
Behavioural validation
Parameters
| Parameter | Value | Evidence | Why |
|---|